Ravelex
General Hype => Music => Topic started by: danzig on 04/05/12, 12:55
ngutip dari forum lain:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
seems the stupidity that originally beatport invented is now worldwide accepted. "original", "original mix" and similar bullshit is now all over the place. especially "original mix" bothers me endless. if it's the original track how can it be a mix then? mixed from what? samples? notes? or should it be more like a proof of quality, like "genuine leather"? "that's not a shitty chinese remix, that's the ORIGINAL MIX yea bitch!"
beatport was putting in this generic tag automatically on everything that was not a remix, god knows why, and now everyone thinks that must be a part of the trackname and adds it if it makes sense or not. even on a 1 track release without remixes of it...
the only scenario where it makes a bit of a sense for me is on releases with remixes so if the original is marked as (original) i do understand but putting (original mix) on a release without remix(es) doesn't make sense for me at all.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
so true..
wow.. agree sih.. hahha
Quote from: danzig on 04/05/12, 12:55
ngutip dari forum lain:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
beatport
kena lagi ;D
haha. gw pribadi ga ada masalah sih sama beatport. bagus kok buat denger2 sample n chart dj2 favorit..
hahahaha
masuk akal sih..
emg ga penting sih embel2 "original mix." kalo ditulis judul lagunya doang jg udah jelas bgt itu bukan remix, hehe.
menurut gw sih ga masalah mau ditulis original mix ato enggak, cuma klo gw searching di itunes ato dimana gt kata "Original Mix" adalah salah satu yang membedakan musik EDM dengan musik yg lain. imho *peace *maaf sotoy